检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘壮[1] 张倩云[1] 郭海强[1] 刘红波[1]
机构地区:[1]中国医科大学公共卫生学院卫生统计教研室,沈阳市110001
出 处:《中国卫生信息管理杂志》2014年第3期296-303,共8页Chinese Journal of Health Informatics and Management
摘 要:目的研究广义线性混合模型在煤工尘肺发病影响因素的应用,为煤工尘肺及类似疾病的发病影响因素研究提供新的方法。方法收集煤矿集团所属8个煤矿所有接尘矿工的资料,用SAS进行卡方检验、Logistic回归进行尘肺发病影响因素研究,并与SAS nlmixed模块实现的广义混合现行模型结果进行比较。结果单因素分析、Logistic回归和广义线性混合模型显示:工龄、接尘时间和工种均为尘肺发病的影响因素,工作地点作为随机效应结果差异无统计学意义。结论广义线性混合模型因考虑了不同工人工作地点的不同和随机效应,结果虽然和其他方法一致,但是更有说服力,与其他方法相比是研究尘肺发病影响因素较好的方法。Objective Explore the risk factors of coal worker’s pneumoconiosis (CWP) by using generalized linear mixed models. Methods The study was performed by using longitudinal retrospective data in Tiefa colliery in northern China. The generalized linear model was implemented in the NLMIXED procedure in SAS and compared to chi square and logistic regression. Result Chi square test showed the duration of exposure to dust, period of first exposure to dust, and job type were the risk factors of CWP. Logistic regression showed the duration of exposure to dust, period of first exposure to dust, and job type were the risk factors of CWP. The generalized linear mixed models: duration of exposure to dust, period of first exposure to dust, and job type were the risk factors of CWP, whereas the working place is not a random effect in statistics. Conclusion The generalized linear mixed model considers the random effects and the errors, therefore it is a superior approach in assessing the risk factors of CWP.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.188