检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]首都师范大学三维信息获取与应用教育部重点实验室,北京100048 [2]首都师范大学城市环境过程与数字模拟国家重点实验室培育基地,北京100048
出 处:《资源开发与市场》2014年第8期924-928,F0003,共6页Resource Development & Market
基 金:"十二五"国家科技支撑计划项目(编号:2012BAH33B03;2012BAH33B05)资助
摘 要:构建交通优势度评价模型,对武陵山片区周边四省共307个县级单元进行评价,并与反映县域贫困的重要指标之一的人均GDP进行耦合。结果表明:交通优势度与交通—经济耦合协调度在整体范围上呈明显的中心—外围分布,在片区内呈东高西低的格局,且存在较强的空间集聚效应。交通优势度与贫困水平呈显著正向相关关系,交通是区域贫困的重要原因。黔江区和怀化市可规划为交通枢纽中心,黔江、怀化、张家界和铜仁市区可作为中心城市进行规划。This paper built the transport superiority evaluation model to calculate the transport superiority of total 307 county unit in Wuling Mountain Area and its surrounding four provinces, then used county per capita GDP for coupling. The results indicated that:Transport superiority and trafficeconomic coupling coordination degrees had similar distribution. In large range, it was obviously of centerperimeter distribution in Wuling Mountain Area. It was east high west low pattern, and space concentration was high. There was a significant positive correlation between transport su- periority and poverty. Transport became an important factor in economic development. Huaihua and Qianjiang could be treated as transportation hub. Qianjiang, Huaihua, Zhangjiajie, Tongren could be planned as center city.
分 类 号:X22[环境科学与工程—环境科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145