中国典型山地冰川平衡线的影响因素分析  被引量:5

Theoretical glacial equilibrium line altitudes and their influencing factors in the typical mountains of China

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:张威[1] 刘蓓蓓[1] 崔之久[2] 李洋洋[1] 刘亮[1] 

机构地区:[1]辽宁师范大学城市与环境学院,大连116029 [2]北京大学城市与环境学院,北京100871

出  处:《地理学报》2014年第7期958-968,共11页Acta Geographica Sinica

基  金:国家自然科学基金项目(41271093;41230743;40971010)~~

摘  要:中国典型山地无现代冰川作用区冰川平衡线高度的确定对于过去环境变化研究具有重要的科学意义。选取青藏高原边缘17个山体的28个气象站气温与降水数据,采用确定的最大降水带与经验曲线关系法(简称MPC,下同)、确定的最大降水带与统计公式法(MPF)和实际气象站降水与经验公式法(WPF),恢复了17个山地的现代理论冰川平衡线高度,并对比了三种方法的适用性;综合分析了三种方法的原理、参数选取、计算过程以及误差来源;详细讨论了冰川平衡线处气温与降水关系式、气象站的海拔高度、气温垂直递减率、降水梯度对计算现代冰川平衡线的影响。提出了无现代冰川区的现代理论冰川平衡线计算的综合因子法(ZYZ)。It is important to reconstruct the past environmental changes for unglaciated areain the typical mountains of the Tibetan Plateau and in eastern China by using moderntheoretical equilibrium line altitudes (ELAs). Based on the data from 28 meteorologicalstations of 17 typical mountains, the ELAs were calculated by the methods of MaximumPrecipitation Zoneand Empirical Curve (MPC), Maximum Precipitation Zone and EmpiricalFormula (MPF) and Meteorological Precipitation and Empirical Formula (WPF). Researchresults show that, MPF is better than WPF through the comparison of the applicabilitybetween these two methods in the study areas. The results also indicate that the factorsaffecting the ELAs are precipitation, temperature, altitude of the meteorological stations andlapse rate of temperature. Based on the in-depth analysis of the principle, parameter selection,computational process and error sources, the authors put forward a newly improved methodfor calculating modern theoretical ELAs.

关 键 词:平衡线 青藏高原 降水梯度 气温 冰川 

分 类 号:P343.6[天文地球—水文科学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象