检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中国实验动物学报》2014年第3期67-71,77,共6页Acta Laboratorium Animalis Scientia Sinica
基 金:国家科技重大专项课题(课题编号:2009ZX09502-018)
摘 要:目的比较不同治疗方案对H22肝癌荷瘤小鼠的疗效。方法采用H22腋下实体瘤KM小鼠及小鼠标准化、计量化辨证方法,观察复合化疗方案局部注射、索拉非尼口服,及两者联合应用等对小鼠抑瘤率和证候的影响。结果所选用3个治疗方案均具有一定的抑瘤作用,综合对气血阴阳证候的影响及胸腺和脾脏重量,以复合化疗方案局部注射联合索拉非尼口服最好。结论局部介入联合索拉非尼口服方案疗效较好。Objective To compare the therapeutic effect of three treatment regimens on H 22 tumor-bearing mice. Methods H22 tumor-bearing mice were treated by local injection of compound chemotherapeutic agents (5-FU, mitomy-cin and cisplatin ) , oral administration of sorafeni , or the both combined , respectively .Standardized and quantitative syn-drome differentiation methods were used to assess the syndromes and tumor-inhibition rate in the mice .Results All these three therapeutic regimens were effective in suppressing the tumor growth in mice .Among them, the combined therapeutic regimen of local injection of compound chemotherapeutic drugs plus oral administration of sorafeni was the best .Conclusion The effect of sorafenib combined with local injection of compound chemotherapeutic agents is better than the other two regimens used separately .
分 类 号:Q95-33[生物学—动物学] R394.2[医药卫生—医学遗传学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.118.31.32