试论姚振宗《七略佚文》的误失  

On erros in the edition of Qi Lue compiled by Yao Zhenzong

作　　者：孙振田[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]西安工业大学人文学院,陕西西安710032 [2]陕西师范大学文学院,陕西西安710119

出　　处：《中南大学学报（社会科学版）》2014年第4期226-231,共6页Journal of Central South University：Social Sciences

基　　金：国家社科基金"<汉书.艺文志>注解长编与研究"(11XTQ013);教育部社科基金"中国著名目录学家个案研究--姚振宗目录学研究"(09YJC870026)

摘　　要：在诸家《七略》辑本中,姚振宗《七略佚文》无疑是一部成功之作,但也存在一些误失,主要包括两个方面:一是将《汉志》班固注整体上(极少数除外)作为佚文予以辑录,有所不当;二是某些具体的佚文辑录及书籍的还原处理等存在着明显的误失:将班固所自作之注作为《七略》之佚文予以辑录;对《汉志》所"省"之书籍的还原著录尚存未至之处;对有些书籍篇数的还原失于准确;个别书籍还原著录时的类别归属有误。Among a vast array of editions of Qi Lue, Yao Zhenzong’s version can be considered as a real tour de force. However, two drawbacks emerge： the annotation of Han Zhi by Ban Gu is virtually all compiled, which can be controversial. The selection of some specific lost articles and the handling of books can pose questions. Meanwhile, these downsides can be categorized into four aspects：the selection of Ban Gu’s annotation by himself as lost articles;the inadequate cover of works axed in Han Zhi; the inapt number of articles; the amiss classification of books. This paper uncovers and rectifies these mistakes.

关 键 词：姚振宗 《七略佚文》 班固 刘向 《汉志》 《别录》 

分 类 号：G257[文化科学—图书馆学]