检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈骏[1] 席玮[1] 武贝[1] 余辉[1] 吴建达[1] 陆逸[1] 陈世晞[1]
机构地区:[1]南京江苏省肿瘤医院南京医科大学附属肿瘤医院放射科介入组,210009
出 处:《介入放射学杂志》2014年第7期584-587,共4页Journal of Interventional Radiology
摘 要:目的探讨经动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)联合索拉非尼治疗肝癌后短期内的肝动脉DSA血流动力学表现。方法回顾性分析30例TACE治疗肝癌病例,其中治疗组13例,对照组17例。治疗组除接受TACE治疗外,还在治疗前1周、或治疗后2周内开始口服索拉非尼400 mg每日2次。对照组只给予TACE治疗。分析患者第1次和3个月后TACE治疗的DSA图像。用Photoshop软件在动态系列DSA图像上测量肿瘤的染色灰度,并绘制肿瘤染色的时间-密度曲线。比较两组患者肿瘤染色的峰值强度(PV),达峰值时间(TP)和曲线上升支斜率(SU)。结果 Photoshop软件可以测量DSA图像中肿瘤组织的染色灰度。治疗组治疗后的染色PV小于治疗前(分别为38.0±14.6和46.7±18.4,P=0.040)、也小于对照组治疗后的染色PV(分别为38.0±14.6和54.4±19.8,P=0.011)。两组之间以及每组治疗前后的TP和SU差异无统计学意义。结论 TACE联合索拉非尼治疗肝癌后短期内的肝动脉DSA肿瘤染色峰值下降。Objective To investigate DSA- estimated hepatic arterial hemodynamics of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) determined shortly after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus sorafenib treatment. Methods The clinical data of thirty HCC patients treated with TACE were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into study group (n = 13) and control group (n = 17). Patients in the study group received additional oral administration of 400mg sorafenib twice a day one week before or two weeks after TACE procedure, while patients in the control group received TACE only. The initial DSA images as well as the images obtained at three months after TACE were analyzed. With the help of Photoshop software, the grey gradient of the tumor staining was measured on the series dynamic DSA images, based on which the time- density curve of the tumor was drawn. The peak density value (PV), the time to reach the peak (TP) and the slope of the upslope (SU) were determined, and the results were compared between the two groups. Results Photoshop software was used to measure the grey density values of the tumor staining on DSA images. In the study group, the post- treatment PV was smaller than the pre- treatment one, which were (38.0 ± 14.6) and (46.7 ± 18.4) respectively, the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P = 0.040). The post- treatment PV of the study group was also smaller than that of the post -treatment PV of the control group (54.4 ± 19.8), and the difference between the two was also statistically significant (P = 0.011). No significant differences in TP values and SU values existed between the two groups as well as between the pre - treatment and post - treatment ones in each group. Conclusion After TACE.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.248