活髓牙与死髓牙折裂后保守治疗疗效比较分析  

Comparative Analysis of Conservative Therapy for Vital Teeth and Dead Pulp after Fracture

作　　者：艾丽娟[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]昆明医科大学第三附属医院 [2]云南省肿瘤医院口腔内科,云南昆明650118

出　　处：《昆明医科大学学报》2014年第8期127-129,共3页Journal of Kunming Medical University

摘　　要：目的比较分析牙纵折后活髓牙和死髓牙保守治疗的临床疗效差别.方法将出现纵折牙齿分为活髓牙组和死髓牙组,分别进行直接口内粘结,术后4周进行全冠修复.术后6个月、12个月复查,根据临床症状、牙周状况进行分级,并进行统计分析.结果 6个月随访结果表明,两种方法的半年成功率没有显著差异(P>0.05);1 a随访结果显示,活髓牙组较死髓牙组成功率高(P<0.05).结论活髓牙牙纵折后保守治疗疗效好于死髓牙.Objective To comparatively analyze the clinical efficacy of conservative treatment for vital teeth after tooth fractures and dead dental pulp.Methods Vertically fractured teeth were divided vital teeth group and dead dental pulp group,and were given direct intraoral bonding,and complete coronal restoration were given four weeks later.Six months and twelve months after treatment,patients were reviewed,and graded according to clinical manifestations and periodontal status,and the data were statistically analyzed.Results The results of six minths follow-up showed that the success rate in half a year had no significantly difference between two methods （P ＞0.05）.The results of one year follow-up showed that the success rate in one year was higher in vital teeth group than that in dead dental pulp group （P＜0.05）.Conclusion Conservative treatment has better effect for vital teeth than dead dental pulp.

关 键 词：纵折 活髓牙 死髓牙 粘结 

分 类 号：R782.1[医药卫生—口腔医学]