检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:任小丹[1] 曹静[2] 崔海松[3] 朱荣申[2] 赵旭东[4] 诸秉根[2]
机构地区:[1]首都医科大学附属北京安定医院抑郁症治疗中心,北京100088 [2]同济大学附属第十人民医院精神心理科,上海200072 [3]同济大学附属同济医院心身科,上海200065 [4]同济大学附属东方医院临床心理科,上海200120
出 处:《同济大学学报(医学版)》2014年第3期118-122,共5页Journal of Tongji University(Medical Science)
摘 要:目的探讨大学生攻击行为与家庭功能的相关关系。方法采用攻击问卷中文版(AQ-CV)、家庭功能评定量表(FAD)和系统家庭动力学自评问卷(QSFD)对随机抽取的上海某大学300名大一新生测评。结果身体攻击(t=3.77,P<0.001)、愤怒(t=-2.61,P<0.010)存在性别差异;攻击行为高、低分组在问题解决(PS)、沟通(CM)、角色(RL)、情感介入(AI)、行为控制(BC)、总的功能(GF)、家庭气氛、个性化、疾病观念上差异有统计学意义;除系统逻辑外,攻击行为与家庭功能各维度存在显著相关;问题解决(PS)、角色(RL)、情感介入(AI)、行为控制(BC)、总的功能(GF)及个性化可有效预测大学生攻击行为。结论家庭功能与大学生攻击行为存在显著相关,了解大学生家庭功能情况,有助于攻击行为的预防及处置。Objective To survey the features of aggressive behavior and its relation to family functioning in college students.Methods A survey with AQ-CV,FAD,QSFD A forms was conducted in 300 freshmen,who were randomly selected from one university in Shanghai.Results There was a gender difference in Physical aggression(t = 3.77,P 0.001) and anger(t =-2.61,P 0.01).There were significant differences in problem solving(PS),communication(CM),role(RL),affective involvement(AI),behavioral control(BC),general functioning(GF),family atmosphere,personality and concept of disease between high offensive and low offensive students.The aggressive behaviors were correlated with all dimensions of family function,except systemic logic.PS,RL,AI,BC,GF and personality could effectively predict aggressive behaviors.Conclusion The aggressive behaviors of college students are significantly related to family functioning,and evaluation of family functioning will be helpful to prevent and handle the aggressive behaviors of students.
分 类 号:R744[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30