我国心理从业人员社会支持现状调查  

A Survey of Social Support among Psychotherapists in China

作　　者：魏虹[1] 马学尧[2] 施琪嘉[3] 

机构地区：[1]浙江传媒学院学生处心理健康与生命教育中心,杭州310018 [2]华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院神经内科,武汉430030 [3]华中科技大学同济医学院附属精神卫生中心武汉市心理医院,武汉430013

出　　处：《神经损伤与功能重建》2014年第4期285-287,共3页Neural Injury and Functional Reconstruction

基　　金：国家科技支撑计划项目(No.2009BAI77B07)

摘　　要：目的:探讨我国心理从业人员社会支持水平。方法:以华东、中南和西北地区的600名心理从业人员为研究对象,采用社会支持评定量表(SSRS)为研究工具,问卷调查后运用描述统计、差异检验等进行统计。结果:不同性别的心理从业人员SSRS总分及3个维度无统计学差异;不同地区的心理从业人员主观支持上无统计学差异,总分及客观支持和对支持的利用度上有统计学意义(P<0.05),华东地区与西北地区和中南地区差异显著;来自学校、医院和社会机构的心理从业人员的社会支持无统计学差异(P>0.05);专职和兼职心理从业人员的客观支持差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:华东地区心理从业人员的客观支持和对支持的利用度上高于中南地区和西北地区;兼职心理从业人员的客观支持高于专职心理从业人员。Objective： To examine the psychotherapists＇ social support in China. Methods： Social support rating scale （SSRS） was applied to 600 psychologists from east China, central south and northwest area. Descriptive statistics and difference test were used for statistical analysis. Results： SSRS score and its three dimensions had no differences between males and females. Subjective support had no differences in different regions, but social support, objective support and utilization score had significant differences （P〈0.05）. Social support score and its three dimensions had no significant differences in the different institutions （P〉0.05）. Objective support score had significant differences between part-time and full-time psychotherapists （P〈0.05）. Conclusion： Objective support and utilization support of eastern psychotherapists were higher than other regions. Objective support of part-time psychotherapists was higher than full-time psychotherapists.

关 键 词：心理从业人员 社会支持 性别 地区 单位 

分 类 号：R741[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学] R749[医药卫生—临床医学]