检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《廉政文化研究》2014年第4期41-47,共7页Anti-corruption and Integrity Culture Studies
基 金:国家社科基金项目(12BFX049);江西省高校人文社会科学规划项目(fx1221)
摘 要:传统观点认为廉政风险存在于公权力运行体系之中,但却忽视了个体社会化进程中自我控制能力的养成、社会观念的隐性储备与准"腐败"行为首次生成等变量对最终腐败行为的作用机制。完整的廉政风险应由前端风险与本体风险构成。公务人员入职之前的个体社会化失范所引发的对个体犯罪性的高度盖然性是廉政前端风险的风险源。因此,有必要从家庭、教育、文化、准入四个层面进行廉政风险干预,防止个体犯罪的盖然性转化为廉政前端风险。The traditional view considers that the risk of integrity politics exists in public power operation system, ignoring how the variables, such as cultivation of self control ability, social concept’s hidden reserves and expectant “corruption”behavior, play a role in the ultimate formation of corruption. Therefore, the complete integrity risk of politics should be constituted by front risk and ontological risk. An individual criminal’s uncertain state caused by civil servants’individual social anomie contributes to the source of front risks of clean politics. Consequently, it’s necessary to interfere in the risk prevention from the perspectives of family, education, culture and access so as to prevent the possibility from transferring into reality.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28