检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]上海财经大学金融学院,上海200433 [2]复旦大学管理学院,上海200433
出 处:《郑州航空工业管理学院学报》2014年第4期31-43,共13页Journal of Zhengzhou University of Aeronautics
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(71202007);教育部科技创新工程重大项目(708040)
摘 要:从公司收入分配角度研究不同所有权性质公司的企业利益和员工利益,研究发现不同所有权结构的企业生产效率差异不大,私有企业的企业利益优于国有企业,国有相对控股企业和私有相对控股企业的企业利益与员工利益相对较好,混合制企业的生产效率可能较低,企业利益与员工利益也相对较差。没有发现支持国有控股企业有大量冗员的证据,国企改革取得部分成功。The paper studies the interests of firms with different ownership structures and the interests of its employees from the perspective of the distribution of firms' income. It was found that there was little difference in the efficiency of productivity for corporations with different ownership structures. Private - owned firms were more profitable compared with state -owned firm. Firms relatively controlled by private entities or state were relatively profitable and distributed more interests to their employees compared with other firms. Mixed firms performed the worst in both productive efficiency and the interests of the firms and the employees. There was no evidence of overstaffing in state - owned firms.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222