检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:薛桂波[1]
机构地区:[1]南京林业大学江苏环境与发展研究中心,南京210037
出 处:《自然辩证法研究》2014年第9期71-76,共6页Studies in Dialectics of Nature
基 金:教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(11YJC720050);江苏省社会科学基金项目(13ZXB008);江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目(11SJB05);江苏高校哲学社会科学基金项目(2014SJB038)
摘 要:科学家参与政府决策已经成为现代政府管理的一个重要环节和组成部分。我国自改革开放以来,科学家在政府决策中的参与度逐步提高,在推进决策的科学化和民主化、促进社会进步等方面做出了重要贡献。然而,在参与政府决策过程中,科学家的学术不端行为频繁发生,在一定程度上降低了决策的科学性。应通过健全科研诚信机制、完善科学咨询制度、引入公众参与、重构以责任为核心的科学"理想主义"等措施,提高科学家参与政府决策的有序性和规范性,才能真正促进政府决策的科学化与合理化。Scientists have involved in govemment decision -making, which has become an important and integral part of modem government decision - making. In China, since the reform and opening up, scientists' participation in government decision - making gradually increase, and has made important contributions in promoting scientific and democratic decision - making and social progress. However, in the process of the participation in government decision -making, academic misconduct of scientists frequently occur, which has badly affected the scientific decision - making. We should adopt such measures as a sound scientific integrity mechanism, improving the scientific advisory system, the introduction of public participation, the reconstruction of science idealism to promote the scientific level and rationalization of the government policy - making.
分 类 号:N031[自然科学总论—科学技术哲学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.152