检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:裴蓓[1]
机构地区:[1]浙江工商大学法学院
出 处:《行政法学研究》2014年第3期80-87,共8页ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW
基 金:2013年度教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目"非诉行政执行案件司法审查的实证分析--以浙江法院实践为例"(13YJC820064)的阶段性成果
摘 要:一直以来,非诉行政案件执行中的"执行难"、"执行效率低下"等现象日益严重,影响了法律的权威和尊严。随着行政强制执行制度改革的深化,非诉行政案件执行模式的创新、优化,成为我们关注的焦点。从浙江法院的实践中,可以看出我国非诉行政案件执行制度的演变背景和一些现实存在的问题。"裁执分离"机制的完善需要通过突出法院的司法审查和监督指导职能,政府重新定位以提高非诉案件执行力,落实"程序合法、补偿到位"的原则三方面来实现。For a long time, the phenomenon such as ‘difficult enforcement’ and ‘inefficiency’ in non litigious administrative cases become ever more serious, affecting the authority and dignity of the law. Along with the deepening of the administrative enforcement system reform, the innovation and optimization on the implementation mode of non litigious administrative cases become the ifrst concern for people. From the court practice in Zhejiang province, its evolution background and existing problems can be explored some. So the improvement of the mechanism of ‘separation of adjudication and implementation’ needs the support from three aspects, namely, the judicial review as well as supervision and guidance function of the court should be highlighted, the role of government should be relocated to strengthen the non litigious case enforcement power, and principles of ‘procedural legitimacy and appropriate compensation’ should be implemented.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.33