检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:曹曙[1] 胡卫列[1] 韩立新[2] 曹惠霞[2]
机构地区:[1]广州军区广州总医院泌尿外科,广州510000 [2]广州军区广州总医院磁共振室,广州510000
出 处:《重庆医学》2014年第22期2868-2869,2872,共3页Chongqing medicine
摘 要:目的:研究直肠指检(DRE)、经直肠超声检查(TRUS)及多参数磁共振成像(MP-MRI)在前列腺癌诊断的应用价值。方法回顾分析113例临床疑似前列腺癌患者数据。结果所有疑似前列腺癌患者中,DRE的灵敏度为33.3%,特异度为88.7%;TRUS的灵敏度为62.7%,特异度为67.7%;MP-MRI的灵敏度为86.3%,特异度为83.9%。3组间两两比较差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。在 PSA 4.0~10.0 ng/mL的 PSA灰区疑似前列腺癌患者中,DRE的灵敏度为27.8%,特异度为86.5%;TRUS的灵敏度为44.4%,特异度为59.5%;MP-MRI的灵敏度为77.8%,特异度为81.1%。3组间两两比较差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 MP-MRI在前列腺癌诊断中表现出了较好的检测效能,并能减少灰区前列腺癌的漏诊,具有重要价值。Objective To evaluate the effect of noninvasive diagnosis methods direct rectal examination (DRE) ,transrectal ultra-sonography(TRUS) and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging(MP-MRI) for prostate cancer detection .Methods The clini-cal data of 113 patients suspected prostatic cancer were analyzed retrospectively .Every patient was examined by TRUS ,DRE and MP-MRI before pathology or operation .The sensitivity rate and the specificity rate of DRE ,TRUS and MP-MRI were calculated and compared among the three methods .Results The sensitivity rate and the specificity rate of prostate cancer were 33 .3% and 88 .7% for DRE ,62 .7% and 67 .7% for TRUS ,86 .3% and 83 .9% for MP-MRI respectively ,two comparison between the three group had statisfically difference(P〈0 .05) .But ,of prostate cancer with prostate specific antigen (PSA) 4 .0~10 .0 ng/mL in gray zone ,the sensitivity rate and the specificity rate were 27 .8% and 86 .5% for DRE ,44 .4% and 59 .5% for TRUS ,77 .8% and 81 .1% for MP-MRI ,two comparison between the three group had statisfically difference(P〈0 .05) .Conclusion MP-MRI has bet-ter detection efficiency .It could obviously reduce the missed diagnosis rate on PCA with PSA in gray zone .
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28