鼻内镜下鼻腔泪囊造孔术与传统泪囊鼻腔吻合术的疗效分析  

Nasal endoscopic nasal lacrimal sac pore-forming technique with traditional lacrimal sac nasal cavity anastomosis curative effect analysis

作　　者：刘春江[1] 周辉[1] 纪昌林[1] 丁均[1] 刘旭东[1] 

机构地区：[1]汉江水利水电集团有限责任公司汉江医院眼科,湖北丹江口442700

出　　处：《世界最新医学信息文摘》2014年第14期32-33,35,共3页World Latest Medicine Information Electronic Version

摘　　要：目的：比较鼻内镜下鼻腔泪囊造孔术与传统泪囊鼻腔吻合术的疗效。方法取自我院2009年3月∽2012年10月间慢性泪囊炎患者78例（80眼），随机分为鼻内镜下治疗组42眼和对照组38眼。治疗组采用经鼻内镜下鼻腔泪囊造孔术，对照组采用传统面部切口泪囊鼻腔吻合术。结果术后随访3∽6个月。治疗组治愈率87.50％，对照组89.47％，两组患者治愈率差异无统计学意义（P 〉0.05）。结论经鼻内镜下行鼻腔造孔术具有操作简便、时间短、出血少、面部不留疤痕等较多优点，其手术效果接近于传统手术，符合现代外科手术微创要求，值得推广。Objective to compare the nasal endoscopic nasal lacrimal sac pore-forming technique with traditional lacrimal sac the curative effect of nasal cavity anastomosis. Methods from March 2009 to october 2012 patients with chronic dacryocystitis between 78 cases （80 eyes）, were randomly divided into treatment group （42 eyes and endoscopic control group 38 eyes. treatment group with nasal endoscopic nasal lacrimal sac pore, the control group with traditional facial incision anastomosis of lacrimal sac nasal cavity. Results Were followed up for 3 ∽ 6 months after surgery. treatment group cure rate 87.50%, control group 89.47%, cure rate differences between two groups of patients have no statistical significance （P 〉 0.05）. Conclusion the downward nasal endoscope pore technique has simple operation, short time, less bleeding and face any more advantages, such as its operation effect is close to traditional surgery, conform to the requirements of the modern minimally invasive surgery, is worth promoting.

关 键 词：鼻内镜 鼻腔泪囊吻合术 慢性泪囊炎 

分 类 号：R779.6[医药卫生—眼科]