行政诉讼重作判决必要性再探讨  

Further Discussion on the Necessity of Judgment for Conducting Again in Administrative Litigation

作　　者：刘涵[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京大学法学院,北京100871

出　　处：《泰山学院学报》2014年第4期103-110,共8页Journal of Taishan University

摘　　要：一方面,抛开法解释论的框架,无论是从审查强度、审判范围还是保障行政相对人权益的角度出发,对重作判决与撤销判决的关系进行重新审视,都可以对重作判决的"附属"地位提出有力的质疑;另一方面,其又与变更判决、履行判决的功能重叠、分野不清,重作判决的"独立"地位岌岌可危。重作判决的性质归属难题辅之以实践中其被不同程度解构的事实,导致其必要性进一步弱化。而站在优化行政诉讼判决结构的高度,借鉴其他国家和地区的做法,完善重作判决乃是必由之路。On the one hand, instead of the framework of explanation of law, re - examining the relation- ship of the Judgment for Conducting Again and Judgment for Rescinding, whether the former is the complement of the latter could be questioned by the angle of intensity of review, trial scope or guarantee of the administrative counterpart＇s rights and benefits; on the other hand, Judgment for Conducting Again has overlap function and fuzzy division with Judgment for Alteration and Judgment for Performance, the independent status of Judgment for Conducting Again would be almost overthrown. In addition, with being deconstructed in various degrees in practice, the necessity of Judgment for Conducting Again is further weakening. With a view to optimization of judgment structure of administrative litigation, drawing a lesson from other countries and regions, it the only way to perfect the Judgment for Conducting Again.

关 键 词：重作判决 撤销判决 必要性 变更判决 履行判决 

分 类 号：DF74[政治法律—诉讼法学]