检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:胡艳[1] 巫海娣[1] 莫永珍[1] 顾刘宝[1] 王洁[1]
机构地区:[1]江苏省省级机关医院内分泌科,江苏省南京市210024
出 处:《实用老年医学》2014年第8期693-696,共4页Practical Geriatrics
摘 要:目的探讨对新诊断2型糖尿病患者应用结构化教育模式进行一对一指导时,对患者血糖及自我管理能力的影响。方法将76例患者随机分为2组,常规教育组39例和结构化健康教育组37例,随访6月。比较2组患者基线与6月时的糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)、自我管理活动能力问卷(SDSCA)评分及自我健康状况评分。结果 6月后2组患者HbA1c、SDSCA评分和自我健康评分均有明显改善(P<0.05),结构化教育组改善情况优于常规教育组(P<0.05)。结论与现有一对一指导模式相比,采用结构化教育的一对一指导模式更能改善新诊断2型糖尿病患者的血糖及自我管理能力。Objective To investigate the effects of structured diabetes education on the patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes, including the levels of blood glucose, ability of self-management, and their psychological situations. Methods Seventy-six patients were divided into two groups, receiving conventional education (n = 39) or structured educa- tion (n= 37) for 6 months. Blood glucose level, score of self-management (SDSCA), and self-health evaluation at baseline and after follow-up, as well as the differences were compared between the two groups. Results All the parameters were significantly improved after 6 months, while the patients in the structured education group had more improvements (P〈0. 05). Conclusions Compared to the current face-to-face diabetic education model, structured diabetes education effectively improve the glycemic control and self-management of the patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28