马克思“历史科学”的后黑格尔主义阐释  

Hegelian Interpretation of Marx′s Historical Science

作　　者：王南湜[1] 

机构地区：[1]南开大学哲学院

出　　处：《中国高校社会科学》2014年第5期4-25,157,共22页Social Sciences in Chinese Higher Education Institutions

摘　　要：马克思早期思想中混合着"人本"与"科学"的"双重逻辑"。《德意志意识形态》中提出的与黑格尔思辨的历史哲学相对立的"历史科学"概念,标志着双重逻辑的分离和科学逻辑的发展。从《德意志意识形态》到《资本论》,其"历史科学"臻于成熟。这一"历史科学",一方面像一般近代科学一样将感性世界把握为抽象的数学或逻辑结构,另一方面为描述与自然世界不同的历史过程而发展出了一种"拟历史目的论"。同时,"历史科学"的成熟,也提出了建立一门与之相匹配的"价值科学"的可能性和必要性。Marx's early thought mixed with some kind of dual logic, namely, 'humanistic logic' and 'scientific logic'. The concept of 'historical science', which was proposed in The German Ideology and opposite to Hegel's speculative philosophy of history, marked the separation of the dual logic and the development of scientific logic. Marx's 'historical science' had been becoming mature from The German Ideology to The Capital. This kind of 'historical science', just like the modern science in general, describes the perceptual world as abstract mathematical or logical structure. In order to describe the historical process different from the natural world, Marx developed 'quasi history teleology'. Meanwhile, the mature of 'historical science' also makes it possible and necessary to establish 'science of value' to match it.

关 键 词：历史科学 双重逻辑 拟历史目的论 后黑格尔主义 

分 类 号：B03[哲学宗教—哲学理论]