“称雄科场”抑或“强学待问”?——以《四书疑节》为中心论元代四书“科举”与“研究”的一体化  

Ruling the Roost on Imperial Examination or Studying Hard for Counseling?——The Integration of Imperial Examination and Research on Yuan Dynasty's Four Books: Centered on Four Books Question Abridging

作　　者：许家星[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]南昌大学江右哲学研究中心 [2]人文学院哲学系,江西南昌330031

出　　处：《南昌大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2014年第5期30-37,共8页Journal of Nanchang University(Humanities and Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金青年项目"朱子四书学之系列比较研究"(13CZX045);教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目"江右四书学研究"(10YJC720053)

摘　　要：元代四书"科举之学"颇为独特,它在服务科考的同时还具有"研究之学"的特质,《四书疑节》即充分显示了这一特性。该书以流行的"经疑"形式,围绕《四书集注》辨异析同,解疑释惑,体现出程序化、重复性、集中性等"经疑"科举的共性。然该书还洋溢着"如老吏断案"、"卞是非如数黒白"的"研究之学"特质,时有对朱子学的创新"越轨"之举,显示了经义与理学、《易》与《四书》、民间学术及个人修身与国家教化的同步,深化了四书学与理学关系,对今人把握科举与学术的关联具有一定的意义。Yuan Dynasty＇s Four Books Imperial Examination Learning is unique , which integrates Imperial Examination and research. The character is fully shown by the Four Books question abridging. The book focuses on Four Books variorum, using the popular form of classic question to differentiate and analyze question , showing the common nature such as routinization repeatability and concentrated. On the other hand, Four Books question abridging have distinct feature of studying, just as ＂the aged official settling a lawsuit distinguishing right between wrong as if discriminating dark from white ＂,often surpassing the idea of Four Books variorum with some innovation thought. Taking on the integration of Confucian classics arguments and Neo - Confucianism, yi and Four Books, folk academic and personal cultivation, state education, it is meaningful to understand the relationship between Four Books Learning and Neo -Confucianism, Imperial Examination and academic research.

关 键 词：《四书疑节》 四书 科举之学 研究之学 

分 类 号：B244.99[哲学宗教—中国哲学]