检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]重庆大学经济与工商管理学院,重庆400044 [2]重庆大学现代物流重庆市重点实验室,重庆400044
出 处:《系统工程学报》2014年第4期537-549,共13页Journal of Systems Engineering
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(71271225;71303272)
摘 要:在强制减排和碳排放权交易政策下,研究了受碳排放约束的制造商再制造决策问题.通过建立两周期决策模型。求得并比较了两类减排政策下制造商最优决策的差异.结果表明,当旧产品回收数量充足时,碳排放配额的降低会使新产品产量减少而再制造品产量增加,而单位产品碳排放量较高时,制造商也会增加再制造品的产量;当旧产品回收数量不足时,旧产品回收会成为制约制造商再制造活动的瓶颈.相对于强制减排政策,碳排放权交易政策对制造商更为有利.This paper studies the manufacturer's production decision-making problem under the policy of mandatory emission reduction and carbon emissions trading. The two-cycle production decision models of two emission reduction policies are investigated, and the optimal results are compared. The results show that when the recovery number of used products is sufficient, the new product yield will decrease and the remanufactured product yield will increase if the carbon emission quotas is lower, and manufacturers will also increase the yield of the manufactured product if per unit of carbon emissions is higher. When the recovery number of used products is insufficient, recycling will become a bottleneck of remanufacturing activities. Compared with the mandatory emission reductions policy, carbon emissions trading is more favorable to the manufacturer.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15