国内情报学作者互引分析与学科结构揭示  

Cross-citation Analysis and Disciplinary Structure Reveal of Domestic Information Science Authors

作　　者：王菲菲[1] 杨思洛[2] 

机构地区：[1]北京工业大学经济与管理学院,北京100024 [2]湘潭大学公共管理学院,湖南411105

出　　处：《情报资料工作》2014年第5期21-27,共7页Information and Documentation Services

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目"中外图书情报学科知识图谱比较研究"(编号:11CTQ015)的阶段性成果;"北京工业大学博士科研启动基金项目"资助

摘　　要：文章以CSSCI为数据源,深入剖析国内情报学领域的高产作者互引、高产一高被引作者互引、核心作者互引网络,通过作者互引分析揭示学科结构,并与国外相关情况对比。研究发现,国内该领域研究大致分为3个大类、9个子主题,然而这种主题分类相对模糊,学者研究交叉性和涉及主题多元化现象较为突出,不如国外研究的精专深;国内学者之间的相互认可度未达到国外水平,知识双向流动较少,单向的流动也多局限于地域接近、合作或师生关系中;计量学、竞争情报、信息资源管理以及信息检索等研究方向在国内较为集中,但信息安全、市场与用户分析的研究则相对欠缺。与作者共被引分析相比,作者互引分析更侧重当前活跃学者的互动性,主要展现当前研究热点所在,揭示结果较为分散,二者可互补应用,共同揭示整个领域的科学结构特征。Based on the data from CSSCI, this paper constructed the author cross - citation network, and deeply analyzed the situation about knowledge communication and discipline structure in domestic information science field, then compared with the research status at abroad. The results revealed： the research subjects in this area could be divided into three classes including 9 subjects, while this classification is relatively obscure; scholars mostly involved in cross subjects, are not as specialized and profound as foreign scholars. Mutual recognition between domestic scholars have not reached the level of foreign; there are less two - way flow of knowledge, and one - way flow is also more limited in geographical proximity, cooperative or teacher - student relationship. Domestic scholars are more concentrated in subjects, such as Metrics, competitive intelligence, information resource management, and information retrieval research, with less focus on study of information security and analysis of market users. Comparing with the results of traditional author co - citation analysis, ACCA pays more attention to mutual interaction of currently active scholars and mainly to show the current re- search focus, revealing more dispersed results.

关 键 词：作者互引 情报学 学科结构 比较研究 

分 类 号：G350[文化科学—情报学] G353.1