检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张长思[1,2]
机构地区:[1]福建师范大学体育科学学院,福州350007 [2]首都体育学院研究生部,北京100191
出 处:《河北体育学院学报》2014年第5期85-88,共4页Journal of Hebei Sport University
基 金:国家体育总局社会科学研究项目(1723SS12116)
摘 要:在梳理分析"异化"概念、解读马克思异化劳动理论的基础上,探讨武术异化研究中对异化概念与理论的曲解和误用现象。认为,武术异化研究的主要问题集中在:滥用概念,将异化等同于"变化""变质"或"异常化";断章取义,曲解异化劳动理论;生搬硬套;避重就轻,不针对本质问题进行深入分析,反就无关现象进行表层阐释等等。通过反思,厘清了武术异化与劳动异化的本质区别。On the basis of analyzing the concept of dissimilation, and explaining the dissimilation labor theory of Marx, misun-derstanding and misuse of the concept and theory of dissimilation in the studies of Wushu dissimilation is explored in this article. The key problems of current studies of Wushu dissimilation is well-concentrated at the following aspects: First, wrongly use of the concept of dissimilation. Dissimilation should not be simply considered as change, alteration or abnormalization. Second, quotation out of context which causes a misunderstanding of dissimilation labor theory. Third, mechanically applying the theory of dissimilation. Fourth, focusing on marginal problems rather than core ones. Instead of in-depth analysis of real issues, superficial layers of unrelated phenomenon are always elaborated. The essential differences between Wushu dissimilation and labor dissimilation are reconceptualised after a deep reflection.
分 类 号:G80-054[文化科学—运动人体科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15