检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《北京社会科学》2014年第9期55-66,共12页Social Sciences of Beijing
基 金:国家社会科学基金青年项目(12CFX051)
摘 要:关于电子数据认证现状的实证研究表明,在中国司法实践中,法官对电子数据的认证具有相当的盲目性和随意性。原因主要在于,举证和质证环节留有隐患、法官的认证依据不科学以及制度上缺乏明确的认证标准。为了规范电子数据的认证,法学理论界和司法实务界应当创新理念,统一相互冲突的立法规定,构建系统可行的认证规则并健全司法判例制度等配套保障制度。Empirical studies on the status quo on authentication of electronic evidence show that judges are considerably blind and arbitrary when examining and valuing electronic evidence in Chinese judicial practice. The reasons mainly lie in the hidden troubles from the links of proof and cross-examination, the shortcomings in the judges' authentication bases and the lack of unified authentication criteria. To normalize the authentication of electronic evidence, some proposes are made, such as: bringing forth new ideas of evidence law, unifying those conflict legislations, establishing some systematic and feasible authentication rules and improving supporting systems.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15