检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《商业经济与管理》2014年第9期34-41,共8页Journal of Business Economics
基 金:教育部人文社会科学基金青年项目"企业双能力;经营绩效与国民财富--企业在应对市场与应对政府间的权衡选择"(13YJC790167);辽宁省社会科学基金青年项目"新生代民营企业家队伍建设研究"(L13CGL022)
摘 要:对于企业向官员行贿动机的解释主要有两种相反的观点,一是企业为了获取政府帮助而主动行贿,二是企业在威胁逼迫条件下的被动行贿。文章从企业在应对政府和应对市场两项事务间的权衡出发,构建企业绩效与腐败强度间的二项式回归模型,通过与传统线性回归模型的比较,发现企业腐败是一种主动行为,腐败的目的是为了构建政治关系以获取相应回报。运用世界银行企业调查数据,二次项回归模型显示出绩效与腐败强度间显著的倒U型曲线关系,文章得出了企业的"最优"腐败程度并对其政策含义进行了解释。Because of the linear hypothesis, existing literature shows disagreement on the relationship between corruption andbusiness performance. Some scholars argue that businesses bribe the government actively; others point out its passiveness. The con-flict between the two empirical views shows the different academic understandings of firm corruption. This paper studies the relation-ship between corruption and business performance based on the Weigh options between the business dealing with the government anddealing with the market, and builds a quadratic regression model to investigate the "optimal" degree of dealing with the government.The World Bank's enterprise survey data confirms the reverse U relationship between the business and corruption. The paper thengoes on to explain the "optimal" corruption level and its policy implication.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.43