检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨胜荣[1]
出 处:《湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2014年第5期106-109,共4页Journal of Xiangtan University:Philosophy And Social Sciences
摘 要:新《刑事诉讼法》中规定的简易程序给公诉工作带来了新的机遇与挑战。通过一年多的实施,简易程序公诉模式发生了较大变化,控辩审三方的庭审工作取得了一定的成效。但公诉机关适用简易程序办案仍存在诸多困惑,需要进一步改变公诉模式。确立相对集中办案机制、具体设置开庭阶段简易程序、让律师参与辩诉交易、认真对待被告人的翻供,既可以提高诉讼效率又兼顾到司法公正、公平,实现依法治国。Summary procedure brings new opportunities and challenges for the prosecution work in the provisions of the new "criminal procedural law". Through more than a year, the summary procedure of prosecution mode has greatly changed, the trial work about PDJ among the three parties has made a lot of achievements. But there are still many puzzles while prosecutors handle the cases by summary procedure. '' The establishment of the relative concentration of the case handling mechanism'~ ," The specific settings of summary proce- dure in the trial stage ", "let the lawyers participate in the plea bargaining", "take seriously the defendant~ confession", these ideas can not only improve the efficiency of litigation ,but also take into account the justice, fairness, and the realization of the rule of law.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.51