检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李秉中[1]
机构地区:[1]贵州财经大学
出 处:《教育研究》2014年第10期41-47,共7页Educational Research
摘 要:我国教育经费支出的制度性短缺使全国财政收支总量与教育财政支出比例存在差距,教育经费的内部分配结构失衡,教育经费与行政管理费增长错位。调整基础教育责任分担往往伴随着财政资源不断向上集中,而支出责任却不断向下转移的境况,教育经费支出不足的现实依然如故。破解教育经费支出的制度性短缺须重新划分事权,明晰教育事权责任,借鉴国外教育财政配置的经验,改变教育"管理权限"等于"支出责任"的思维定势,依据"受益范围"和"能力水平"的原则,按支出能力划分支出比例,构建基本规范的国家教育财政制度。The institutional shortage of educational funds expenditure in China has led to the disparity between total national financial revenue and expenditure and the ratio of education expenditure, the imbalance of internal distribution structure, the mismatch of educational expenditure and administrative expenditure. The adjustment of basic educational responsibility sharing is frequently accompanied by the condition of the constant upward concentration of financial resources with the constant downward transfer of duties of expenditure, therefore, the reality of the insufficiency of educational funds expenditure remains as before. To break through the institutional shortage of educational funds expenditure, we should re-clarify the authority of duty, make clear the responsibility of educational duty, draw lessons from the overseas experience of educational finance allocation, change the thinking frames of "administration authority is equal to duties of expenditure", and construct national educational financial system with basic norms abide by the principle of "benefit scope" and "ability level", and divide expenditure proportion according to ability.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.33