检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王嵇[1] 管逊 赵亮[1] 张学彬[1] 许建荣[1]
机构地区:[1]上海交通大学医学院附属仁济医院放射科,200127
出 处:《中华放射学杂志》2014年第9期758-761,共4页Chinese Journal of Radiology
基 金:上海市重点学科建设项目(S30203);上海交通大学医学院重点学科项目[重点学科(第三期)];上海市科委国际科技合作基金(12410708300)
摘 要:目的 探讨采用二维彩色编码DSA技术评估经导管动脉化疗栓塞最佳状态的价值.方法 回顾性分析确诊为肝癌,接受经导管动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)治疗,并采用二维彩色编码DSA(2D-ccDSA)技术进行后处理的24例患者.患者TACE术前、后均行DSA检查,采用DSA彩色编码软件生成二维彩色编码图像和时间密度曲线(TDC).测量导管口、肿瘤供血动脉起点和供血动脉栓塞部位以及肿瘤的达峰时间(TTP),肿瘤血供时间和肿瘤区域TDC最大峰值,并计算栓塞术后肿瘤血供延迟时间.TACE术前、后各参数值的比较采用配对t检验.结果 TACE前导管口和肿瘤供血动脉起点的TTP分别为(3.47 ±0.96)和(4.09±1.09)s,TACE后上述位置的TTP分别为(3.49±1.02)和(3.78±1.05)s,差异无统计学意义(t分别为0.10和1.15,P值分别为0.92和0.26).TACE前、后供血动脉栓塞部位的TTP分别为(4.62±1.16)和(5.59±1.57)s,肿瘤血供时间分别为(0.52±0.41)和(1.82±1.10)s,峰值分别为(3.03±0.88)和(1.10±0.67)灰度单位,差异均有统计学意义(t分别为3.32、6.04和8.93,P均<0.01).栓塞术后肿瘤血供延迟时间为(1.30±1.05)s.结论 二维彩色编码DSA技术可为TACE术最佳状态提供客观且可行的测量指标.Objective To objectively evaluate the endpoint ot transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) using two dimensional color-coded digital subtraction angiography (2D-ccDSA).Methods Retrospective analysis of twenty-four patients diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC),treated by TACE and evaluated by post-processed 2D-ccDSA.All patients were examined by DSA before and after TACE procedure,all these DSA series were converted into color-code images,the time density curve (TDC) was derived from the 2D-ccDSA imaging.Time-to-peak (TTP) was measured for the ostia of the catheter,the origin of the tumor feeding artery (TFA) and the embolized site of the TFA; maximal TDC enhancement was measured for selected spots of the tumor parenchyma.The tumor blood supply time (TBST) for pre and post-TACE was calculated accordingly.Data were interpreted with paired t test using SPSS.Results The TTP of the ostia of the catheter and the origin of the tumor feeding artery (TFA) before TACE were (3.47 ± 0.96) and (4.09 ± 1.09) s,after the TACE were (3.49 ± 1.02) and (3.78 ± 1.05) s,respectively.There was no statistical difference between the pre-and post-procedural TTP of the two landmarks (t values were 0.10 and 1.15,P values were 0.92 and 0.26).TTP at the embolized site of the main TFA were [(4.62± 1.16) and (5.59± 1.57)s]for pre and post-TACE,the tumor blood supply time (TBST) was greatly delayed compared with that after the TACE procedure [(1.82± 1.10)s and (0.52±0.41)s].The mean maximal TDC enhancements of the tumor parenchyma areas were (3.03±0.88)units before TACE and (1.10±0.67)units after TACE.The differences were all statistically significant (t values were 3.32,6.04 and 8.93,respectively,P<0.01) Conclusion It is feasible to use 2D-ccDSA to objectively assess the endpoint of TACE procedures.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7