机构地区:[1]安徽医科大学第一附属医院泌尿外科,安徽合肥230022
出 处:《中华男科学杂志》2014年第9期781-786,共6页National Journal of Andrology
基 金:国家自然科学基金(81370856);卫生部国家临床重点专科建设项目(2012);教育部博士点基金(20113420110003);安徽省自然科学基金(1208085MH138);安徽省科技攻关项目(12010402128)~~
摘 要:目的:探讨上皮-间质转化(EMT)相关蛋白E-cadherin和N-cadherin在中低危前列腺癌和高危前列腺癌中的表达差异,以及E-cadherin和N-cadherin的表达与患者年龄、血清PSA水平、肿瘤组织Gleason评分的关系。方法:回顾性分析42例前列腺癌患者临床资料,将前列腺癌分为高危组27例和中低危组15例。免疫组化法检测两组E-cadherin和N-cadherin的表达,并比较两组有无差异;同时分析E.cadherin和N-cadherin的表达阳性率与血清PSA值、肿瘤Gleason评分及患者年龄的关系。结果:E-cadherin在中低危组的表达水平高于高危组(6.1±0.51vs4.2±O.37,P〈0.01),并且在中低危组中表达阳性率显著高于高危组(73.3%vs25.9%,P〈0.01),E-cadherin在PSA〈20μg/L的患者中表达阳性率高于PSAI〉20μg/L的患者(66.7%vs29.6%,P〈0.05),在Glea-son评分5-7分的患者中,其表达阳性率明显高于Gleason评分8~10分的患者(60.9%vs21.1%,P〈0.05)。N-cadherin在中低危组的表达水平低于高危组(3.7±0.32US7.5±0.58,P〈0.01),并且在中低危组中的表达阳性率低于高危组中(13.3%/3559.3%,P〈0.05),在Gleason评分5-7分的患者中,其表达阳性率明显低于Gleason评分8~10分的患者(26.1%vs63.2%,P〈0.05),N-cadherin在PSA〈20μg/L和PSA≥20μg/L的患者中表达阳性率没有差异(P〉0.05)。E-cadherin和N-cadherin在年龄≥70岁和〈70岁的患者中表达阳性率均没有明显差异(P〉0.05)。结论:E-cadherin和N-cadherin在高危前列腺癌和中低危前列腺癌表达阳性率及表达水平存在差异,即两者与前列腺癌的侵袭转移有关,并且E-cadherin和N-cadherin的表达可能与前列腺癌Glesaon评分、血清PSA水平有关。Objective: To investigate the differences in the expressions of E-cadherin and N-cadherin between high-risk prostate cancer and low- and medium-risk prostate cancer, and analyze their correlation with the age, serum PSA level, and Gleason score of the patients. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 42 cases of prostate cancer, which were divided into a low- and medium-risk group (group A, n = 15 ) and a high-risk group (group B, n = 27 ). We measured the expressions of E-cadherin and N-cadherin by immunohistochemical staining, compared their differences between the two groups, and analyzed their correlation with the age, serum PSA level, and Gleason score of the patients. Results : Immunohistochemieal staining showed that the expression of E-cadherin was significantly higher in group A than in B (6.1 ± 0.51 vs 4.2 ± 0.37, P 〈 0.01 ), and so was its positive rate (73.3%vs 25.9%, P 〈0.05). The positive rate of E-cadherin was also markedly higher in the patients with serum PSA 〈 20 μg/L than in those with serum PSA≥20μg,/L (66.7% vs 29.6%, P〈0.05), and so was it in the patients with the Gleason score 5 -7 than in those with 8 - 10 (60.9% vs 21.1%, P 〈0.05). On the contrary, the N-cadherin expression was significantly lower in group A than in B (3.7 ±0.32 vs 7.5±0.58, P 〈0.01 ), and so was its positive rate (13.3% vs 59.3%, P 〈0.01 ). The positive rate of N-cad- herin was also remarkably lower in the patients with the Gleason score 5 -7 than in those with 8 - 10 (26.1% vs 63.2%, P 〈0.05). However, there were no statistically significant differences in the N-eadherin expression between the patients with serum PSA 〈20 μg/L and those with serum PSA≥20μg/L (P 〉0.05), nor in the expressions of E-cadherin and N-cadherin between the patients aged ≥70 years and those aged 〈 70 years (P 〉 0.05). Conclusion : The expressions of E-cadherin and N-cadherin are significantly different between high-risk prostate cancer and
关 键 词:上皮-间质转化 前列腺癌 E-CADHERIN N-CADHERIN
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...