绎理与训义:论朱熹和高亨对《系辞》的阐释原则  

Philosophical and philological interpretations:Chu Hsi's and Kao Heng's strategies interpreting the Hsi Tz'u

作　　者：李树春[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]北京大学比较文学与比较文化研究所,北京100871 [2]湖北师范学院外国语学院,湖北黄石435002

出　　处：《湖北师范学院学报（哲学社会科学版）》2014年第5期39-42,共4页Journal of Hubei Normal University（Philosophy and Social Science）

摘　　要：中国自汉以来就确立起了一套古代作品阐释传统,但是文随代兴,时移事变,先前的阐释传统被不断突破,新的阐释原则也因之相继出现,对于《易经》的阐释尤其如此。考察《易经》的阐释学史,宋初是一大转关,而上世纪前期"古史辨派"的兴起也昭示一变,此文分别捡取这两段新变中的代表人物朱熹和高亨对《易经·系辞》的阐释,依据二人具体的解《易》文本,来对比他们的阐释思路并揭示出各自相应的阐释原则,分析二人因时而"变易"之原则背后各自所坚持的"不易"之理路。A body of exegetical principles have been established since the Han dynasty in China. However,these principles are being critically reformed and deviated from along with the changes of the literary tastes over time,and subsequently,new principles are provided and taking over the former ones. This is especially so with the Book of Change. The Song dynasty is a critical period when we examine the exegetical history of this book,and so is the 1920 s when the so- called'Ku- shih- pien'School made its advent. In this paper,two representatives,respectively Chu Hsi and Kao Heng,are selected for a comparative reading. Their exegetical strategies are discussed and analyzed based on their textual interpretations of the Book. In the end,their exegetical principles are summarized and why they have applied such principles are explored and explained.

关 键 词：《易经》 依经立义 古史辨派 语文学阐释 

分 类 号：B221[哲学宗教—中国哲学]