检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘磊[1]
出 处:《福建江夏学院学报》2014年第4期49-59,共11页Journal of Fujian Jiangxia University
基 金:教育部人文社会科学青年基金项目(11YJC820070)
摘 要:从欧美国家的检警关系模式观察,主要有检警分立与检警一体两种模式,具体国家的检警关系则又有一定的差异。西方主要各国的检警关系背后有一列正式制度与非正式制度的支撑,我们应当把握二者的共同点,司法审查机制与检警自治是欧美国家检警关系法治化的重要背景。应当转换司法理念对我国检警关系进行改革,维护辩护方正当的诉讼权利与强化司法审查机制,在具体制度上对检警制约机制进行调整。From the Occidental views, there are two models on relationships between police and prosecutor: intergration and seperation models, which vary from nations to nations in details. Behind the relationships in the above there is formal and informal system support to it, we should understand the ideas in commons between them, the backdrop of legalization of the relationship is the judicial review mechanism and the autonomy system. The paper proposes to shift the judicial ideas to reform our relationship between police and prosecutor, to protect the due rights of defenders and strengthen the judicial review system, to adjust the restriction mechanism in specific areas.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38