检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴丽丽[1] 林珠[1] 张基永[1] 谢文佳[1] 翟田田[1] 谢良喜[1]
机构地区:[1]汕头大学医学院附属肿瘤医院放疗科,广东汕头515031
出 处:《重庆医学》2014年第28期3713-3715,3756,共4页Chongqing medicine
基 金:国家自然科学基金委员会面上项目资助(81171994)
摘 要:目的分析宫颈癌骨髓保护调强放疗技术(BMS-IMRI)的物理剂量学特点,探讨其保护骨盆骨髓(PBM)的价值。方法选择接受根治性放疗的ⅡA-ⅢB期宫颈癌患者9例,分别设计BMS-IMRT和三维适形放疗(3D-CRT)计划进行治疗,BMS-IMRT计划要求骨盆骨受量符合以下标准:体积(V)10〈90%、V20〈76%、V40〈40%。结果与3D-CRT计划比较,BMSIMRT计划骨盆骨的V10、V20和V40均明显下降[(80.9±3.4)%vs.(93.2±2.7)%、(64.9±3.9)%vs.(87.8±3.2)%、(17.6±3.5)%vs.(31.9±4.1)%,P〈0.01];同时直肠、膀胱、小肠的剂量均明显下降(P〈0.01)。结论与3D-CRT计划比较,BMS-IMRT计划在不降低传统危及器官剂量限制标准的前提下,可明显的降低骨盆骨受量。Objective To compare bone marrow-sparing intensity-modulated radiotherapy(BMS-IMRT)techniques with threedimension conformal radiotherapy(3D-CRT)techniques in cervical cancer treated with definitive whole pelvic radiotherapy,and to explore its advantage to protect the pelvic bone marrow.Methods Nine patients stagedⅡA-ⅢB cervical cancer were included.BMS-IMRT plans and 3D-CRT plans were created and compared.Dose constraints of pelvic bone for BMS-IMRT plans including:V1090%,V2076%,V4040%.Results Compared with 3D-CRT plans,BMS-IMRT plans significantly reduced the volume of pelvic bone at 10 Gy,20Gy,40 Gy dose levels[(80.9±3.4)%vs.(93.2±2.7)%,(64.9±3.9)%vs.(87.8±3.2)%,(17.6±3.5)%vs.(31.9±4.1)%,P〈0.01],while BMS-IMRT plans significantly reduced the volume of rectum,bowel,bladder at various dose levels(P〈0.01).Conclusion BMS-IMRT plans significantly reduced the volume of pelvic bone marrow irradiated compared with 3D-CRT plans in patients with cervical cancer.In addition,BMS-IMRT did not compromise the sparing of other OARs.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.116