检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈珲[1]
出 处:《中国行政管理》2014年第11期104-108,共5页Chinese Public Administration
摘 要:公共利益在现代社会不断丰富和扩大,与人们的生产、生活联系越来越密切,公共利益的维护成为时代最迫切的需要。然而当代中国的现行立法恰恰回避了公共利益的界定,导致公共利益保护犹如镜花水月。实体法上的缺陷仅是公共利益保护的瑕疵,毕竟大量的立法已经将公共利益纳入了法律保护的视域,公共利益没有获得现行诉讼救济机制充分保护才是立法的重大制度性缺陷。对我国三大诉讼机制在公共利益保护上的具体分析,提出未来立法的完善建议,就是要让公共利益不再失落于现代的诉讼文明之中。Public benefits is increasing and expanding continuously in modem society, which leads to a closer relationship be- tween public benefits and people's production and life, so the preservation of public benefits becomes necessary for this time. But it is hard for theorists to define whether public benefits should be included in the territory of litigation remedy. The law in force in modern China avoids the definition of public benefits, which does cause the nihility of the protection of public benefits. Defects of substantive law are only flaws in public benefits protection, after all, public benefits are already included in the view of legal protection by a lot of legislations, but the serious systematic defect in legislation is actually the exclusion of public benefits from active litigation remedy mechanism. Therefore, the detailed analysis of public benefits protection of the three kinds of litigation mechanisms and the suggestion of the perfection of future legislation, are to avoid the vanishing of public benefits from the modem litigation civilization.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.218.243.199