检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈娟[1] 卢宁[1] 黄建国[1] 王勇强[1] 董雅璐[1] 曹敏[2]
机构地区:[1]兰州军区乌鲁木齐总医院肿瘤诊疗中心,新疆乌鲁木齐830000 [2]新疆医科大学研究生院,新疆乌鲁木齐830000
出 处:《现代肿瘤医学》2014年第10期2421-2423,共3页Journal of Modern Oncology
摘 要:目的:通过调查恶性肿瘤患者化疗前后疲劳状况,探讨化疗后消化道反应、骨髓抑制对疲劳评分的影响。方法:应用一般情况调查表及癌症疲劳量表,对150恶性肿瘤化疗患者进行问卷调查,采用SPSS 18.0软件统计数据分析。结果:恶性肿瘤患者化疗后疲劳评分较化疗前相比多有不同程度增加,差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。化疗期间患者消化道反应越重,疲劳评分越高;有骨髓抑制患者相对无骨髓抑制者疲劳评分高(P<0.001),骨髓抑制程度与疲劳评分关系无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:恶性肿瘤患者化疗期间消化道反应和骨髓抑制是患者化疗后疲劳评分增加的影响因素。Objective:To investigate the status of fatigue in cancer patients before and after chemotherapy and dis-cuss the digestive tract reaction,bone marrow suppression on the fatigue scores before and after chemotherapy. Meth-ods:Totally 150 cancer patients receiving chemotherapy were investigated by personal interview methods,demographic characteristic questionnaire and Fatigue Symptom Inventory. The data analysis and influential factors were performed by SPSS 18. 0 software. Results:The FSI scores increased significantly after chemotherapy(P〈0. 001). The heavier digestive tract reaction during chemotherapy in patients,the higher the fatigue grading. In patients with bone marrow suppression fatigue rate was high(P〈0. 001). But there was no statistically significant difference between the degree of bone marrow suppression and fatigue score(P〉0. 05). Conclusion:The digestive tract reaction,bone marrow sup-pression are the main influencing factors during chemotherapy.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28