检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘国伟[1] 于莉莉[1] 贾洪霞[2] 顾欣[1]
机构地区:[1]济南军区总医院信息科,济南250031 [2]济南军区总医院内分泌科,济南250031
出 处:《中国循证医学杂志》2014年第10期1276-1280,共5页Chinese Journal of Evidence-based Medicine
摘 要:在头对头直接比较证据缺乏的情况下,采用间接比较(ITC)与网状Meta分析对多种干预措施进行比较是近年兴起的一种统计学方法。迄今为止,其理论体系仍在完善之中。本文主要从基本概念、方法假设、有效性影响因素以及分析软件等方面对其发展动态进行简要介绍与总结,以帮助研究者更好地理解该方法,并推动其在证据生产中的使用。Due to the lack of head to head direct comparison evidence, applying indirect comparison (ITC) as well as network meta-analysis to compare multiple interventions becomes a new popular and powerful statistical technique. However, its theoretical system still needs improvement. In this article, we briefly introduce and summarize its progress concerning basic concepts, method assumptions, influencing factors of effectiveness, and software for analysis, so as to help researchers better understand the method and promote its application in evidence production.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.216.248.35