机构地区:[1]江苏大学附属武进医院神经内科,常州213003
出 处:《中华老年医学杂志》2014年第10期1060-1063,共4页Chinese Journal of Geriatrics
基 金:基金项目:常州市武进区科技发展计划项目(武科发(2011]35号WS2011016)
摘 要:目的 调查常州地区缺血性脑卒中复发高危患者二级预防药物的应用情况。 方法 分析2010 2011年在我院住院的300例急性非心源性缺血性脑卒中患者的临床资料,卒中复发高危风险定义为艾森卒中风险评分量表(ESRS)≥3分,比较ESRS不同得分其构成参数的情况.出院时均给予规范的缺血性卒中二级预防指导,随访3个月、1年,调查抗血小板治疗、危险因素药物治疗(降压、降糖治疗)及调脂治疗的使用情况及依从性。 结果 在ESRS评分的参数中,除年龄(x2=126.54,P=0.000)、既往短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)或缺血性卒中(x2=21.27,P=0.000)这两个危险因素在不同得分患者中差异有统计学意义,高血压、糖尿病、既往心肌梗死、其他心脏疾病、吸烟等危险因素在不同得分患者中的差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05).出院时抗血小板治疗率为98.3%(295/300),降压、降糖药物使用率分别为95.0% (255/268)及l00% (72/72),他汀类药物使用率达到99.0%(297/300).3个月后,降压、降糖治疗的依从性最好,分别为88.1%(222/252)、86.2%(56/65);抗血小板药物治疗的依从性次之,其中阿司匹林使用率较高为82.0%(228/278),氯吡格雷使用率较低为6.1%(17/278);调脂药物治疗的依从性最差为60.1%(167/278).1年后,危险因素药物治疗的依从性较3个月时提高,分别为89.9%(220/245)、93.4%(57/61),但差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05);抗血小板(阿司匹林、氯吡格雷)治疗及调脂治疗依从性亦较3个月时提高,分别93.2%(245/263)、30.8(81/263)、88.9%(234/263),差异有统计学意义(均P<0.01),且抗血小板治疗中氯吡格雷使用率增加。结论 常州地区缺血性脑卒中复发高危患者二级预防药物治疗已取得一定成效,长期随访并建立良好的医患沟通可提高二级预防药物治疗的依从性,提高缺血性脑卒中�Objective To investigate the application of secondary prevention medication for patients with high risk of recurrent ischemic stroke in Changzhou city,analyze the reasons for decreased medication compliance,and evaluate the current secondary prevention medication.Methods We investigated 300 consecutive hospitalized patients with acute non-cardiogenic and ischemic stroke high risk.High risk of recurrent stroke was defined as ESSEN Stroke Risk Score (ESRS) ≥3.Different ESRS scales consisting of different parameters were analyzed.All of the patients received standard secondary prevention of ischemic stroke at discharge.After three months and a year follow up,antiplatelet therapy,therapy of risk factors (hypertension and diabetes mellitus),lipid lowering therapy,and medication compliance were investigated.Results Except for age (x2 =126.54,P =0.000) and previous cerebral ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) (x2 =21.27,P =0.000),there were no significant differences in other risk factors (hypertension,diabetes,previous myocardial infarction,heart diseases,smoke) in patients with different ESRS scale scores (all P〉 0.05).Antiplatelet therapy utilization was 98.3% (295/300),antihypertensive and antidiabetic drug use rates were 95.0%(255/268) and 100%(72/72),statin use rate reached to 99% (297/300) at discharge.After three months follow up,medication compliance in hypertension and diabetes mellitus therapy was the best [88.1%(222/252)and 86.2% (56/65)],followed by aspirin [82.0% (228/278)],and clopidogrel [6.1% (17/278)].The medication compliance in lipid lowering therapy was the worst [60.1% (167/278)].After a year follow-up versus the previous three-month follow-up,the medication compliance in hypertension and diabetes mellitus therapy was increased,but had no significant difference [89.9 % (220/245) vs.88.1% (222/252),93.4%(57/61)vs.86.2%(56/65),P〉0.05],and the medication compliances inantiplatelet therapy with aspirin
分 类 号:R743.3[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...