检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]石河子市人民医院口腔科,新疆石河子832000 [2]新疆哈密红星医院口腔科,新疆哈密839000
出 处:《中国美容医学》2014年第18期1563-1565,共3页Chinese Journal of Aesthetic Medicine
摘 要:目的:观察使用Spectrum TPH-3和3M FiltekTM Z350 2种纳米光固化复合树脂修复楔状缺损的的存留率比较。方法:将58例186颗有牙体颈部楔状缺损的患牙随机分为Spectrum TPH-3组30例(96颗)和3M FiltekTM Z350组28例(90颗),修复后2年复查评价2组疗效。结果:Spectrum TPH-3组的成功率为86.53%,3M FiltekTM Z350组的成功率为89.67%。两组成功率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:纳米树脂Spectrum TPH-3和3M FiltekTM Z350是修复楔状缺损的理想材料,值得临床推广使用。Objective To compare the retention rates of Spectrum TPH-3 and 3M FiltekTM Z350 inrepairing the wedge-shaped defects of cervical dental body. Methods 58 patients with 186 wedge- shaped defect teeth were selected and randomly divided into two groups.30 patients with 96 defec teeth were treated with Spectrum TPH-3 resin,and the other 28 patients with 90 defect teeth wer- treated with 3M FiltekTM Z350 resin.All the patients were recalled to evaluate the restoration efficacy two years later. Results The success rate of Spectrum TPH-3 group was 86.53%,3M FiltekTM Z350 group 89.67%. There was no statistical difference between the two groups (P〉0.05). Conclusion Both Spectrum TPH-3 and 3M FiltekTM Z350 resin are ideal materials in repairing the wedge-shaped defects,and worthy of wider clinical application.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28