检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:宋宇涵[1] 黄黄[1] 王继军[2] 郭茜[2] 刘伟才[1]
机构地区:[1]同济大学口腔医学院修复科,上海200072 [2]上海交通大学医学院附属精神卫生中心脑电影像眼动室
出 处:《实用口腔医学杂志》2014年第5期645-648,共4页Journal of Practical Stomatology
基 金:国家自然科学基金(编号:30700960);上海市科学技术委员会科技人才计划(编号:10QA1407400)
摘 要:目的:比较夜磨牙患者与正常对照组经颅磁刺激(TMS)下产生的咬肌运动诱发电位(MEP)的异同。方法:纳入30名夜磨牙患者及30名健康志愿者,单脉冲TMS大脑皮层面部运动区域,记录咬肌MEP,分析比较2组MEP的各项参数。试验均在白天受试者清醒的状态下进行。结果:夜磨牙组咬肌MEP的激发阈值(130%AMT)为53%,对侧MEP(c-MEP)的潜伏期为(6.7±1.3)ms、波幅为0.19(0.15,0.29)mV,三叉神经根MEP(r-MEP)的潜伏期为(2.3±0.4)ms,中枢传导时间(CCT)为4.4(3.3,5.2)ms;正常对照组AMT为52(52,55)%,c-MEP的潜伏期为(6.4±0.7)ms、波幅为0.23(0.17,0.28)mV,r-MEP的潜伏期为(2.4±0.4)ms,CCT为4.0(3.4,4.4)ms,2组咬肌运动诱发电位各项参数均无统计学差别。结论:与正常人相比较,夜磨牙患者大脑皮层运动系统兴奋性未见明显改变。Objective:To study the masseter motor evoked potential(MEP)in patients with sleep bruxism(SB)and in healthy con-trols.Methods:30 subjects with SB and 30 healthy controls were included.MEPs were obtained by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).Tests were done during daytime when the subjects were awake.The data were statistically analysed.Results:In the patients AMT was 55(52,55)%,latency of c-MEP (6.7 ±1.3)ms,the amplitude of c-MEP 0.19(0.15,0.29)mV,latency of r-MEP (2.3 ±0.4)ms,the central conduction time(CCT)4.4(3.3,5.2)ms.In the control subjects AMT was 52(52,55)%,latency of c-MEP (6.4 ±0.7)ms,the amplitude of c-MEP 0.23(0.17,0.28)mV,latency of r-MEP (2.4 ±0.4)ms,CCT 4.0 (3.4,4.4) ms.No significant difference was found between the 2 groups in the measurements evoked by TMS.Conclusion:The MEP after TMS in patients with SB is similar to that of healthy subjects,indicating that the excitability of the cortical motor system is not changed in bruxism subjects,at least when evaluated by TMS.
关 键 词:咬肌运动诱发电位(MEP) 经颅磁刺激(TMS) 夜磨牙(SB)
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.90