《环境保护法》修订案中排污者义务和责任条款的可操作性分析  

Analysis on Operability of Revised Clauses of Polluter's Obligation and Responsibility in Amendment of Environmental Protection Law

作　　者：胡静[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学民商经济法学院,北京100088

出　　处：《南京工业大学学报（社会科学版）》2014年第3期13-22,共10页Journal of Nanjing Tech University：Social Science Edition

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目(13JJD820009);中国政法大学人文社会科学研究项目(11ZFG82005)

摘　　要：《环境保护法》修订案中的排污者义务和责任条款的实效受到有关条款可操作性的制约,对可操作性的分析从法律的完整性、明确性和协调性三个方面进行。排污许可管理和环境监管部门的查封扣押权的规定属于法律不完整;建设项目未评先建的法律责任、重点排污单位监测和信息公开义务、企业事业单位制定突发环境事件应急预案的义务、建设单位充分征求公众意见的义务、超标超总量的法律责任等条款属于法律不够明确,相对而言,规定行政拘留适用的条款具有较强的可操作性;有关按日计罚的规定则和其他法律不协调。因此,有必要分别不同情况对有关条款进行落实、细化和解释。The effectiveness of clauses of polluter＇s obligations and responsibilities in Amendment of Environmental Protection Law is constrained by operability of relative clauses. The operability research will discuss on completeness, explicitness and harmony of the law. The incompleteness of the law appears in the provisions of pollutant discharge license management and environment supervision department＇s power of sealing-up and distraining of property. The inexplicitness of the law occurs in the provisions which allow construction to be made before EIA, in that regulating obligations to monitor and disclose the information of key polluters, the pro- vision stipulating response to the emergent environmental incidents, in that soliciting public opinions and that of penalty for exceeding discharge standard and total amount. In contrast, the provision of administrative detention is more operable. The disharmony of law occurs in the clause of daily penalty. It is necessary to implement, concretize and interpret the relative clauses according to narticular situations.

关 键 词：《环境保护法》修订案 排污许可 排污者义务和责任 环境法律协调性 

分 类 号：D922.68[政治法律—环境与资源保护法学]