完善我国刑事强制措施监督方式的思考  

On Supervisory Model Improvement of the Criminal Compulsory Measures in China

作　　者：田圣斌[1] 

机构地区：[1]江汉大学法学院,湖北武汉430056

出　　处：《新疆大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2014年第5期37-41,共5页Journal of Xinjiang University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

基　　金：教育部"新世纪优秀人才支持计划"资助项目"隐形刑事诉讼法2"(NCET-10-0602);中国法学会项目"羁押必要性审查制度研究"(CLS(2012)D201)

摘　　要：自新《刑事诉讼法》施行以来,人权保障思维导向日渐明显,保障人权与打击犯罪之间的逻辑顺序逐渐成为理论研究与司法实务探讨的重点。加强对于刑事诉讼活动中强制措施的监督十分关键,强制措施通常包括三类:对人身自由权的强制措施,对物的强制措施以及对公民隐私权的强制措施。我国目前法律仅明确规定了关于人身自由权的强制措施,其他强制措施仅仅只有侦查机关内部监督,而且监督方式较为单一,与英美法系和大陆法系相比较,我国强制措施监督方式有待进一步完善。Since the new Crime Procedure Law comes into force, human rights protection have been drawn more attention. The logical sequence of human rights protection and crime fight has become the focus in theoretical study and judicial practices. Based on this background, supervision of criminal compulsory measures becomes more important. There are three types of compulsory measures： relating to personal freedom, involving property rights, and relating to privacy right. Only compulsory measures relating to personal freedom are made clear in present Chinese laws, and the other two are supervised within investigation organs. Compared with the Anglo-American laws and Continental laws, the supervisory model of criminal compulsory measures in China has much to be improved.

关 键 词：强制措施 监督方式 人权保障 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]