陪审制的分权机制与证据法的发展  

Separation of powers mechanism in the jury system and development of evidence law

作　　者：叶自强[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国社会科学院法学研究所,北京100009

出　　处：《证据科学》2014年第4期389-400,共12页Evidence Science

摘　　要：针对我国人民陪审员制目前面临的"陪而不审"、"审而不议"之普遍困境,本文探讨了西方国家陪审制产生和发展的过程,认识到"分权是陪审制成长的基本条件";详细探讨了我国"陪而不审"、"审而不议"现象的主要形态,指出没有实行分权是造成这种困窘局面的根源;讨论了正在兴起的河南人民陪审团制度的进步意义与局限性;主张我国应当建立以分权为首要特征的人民陪审员制度,为此需要立法机关制定有关陪审团如何与法官分享裁判权的制度,其中最关键的是制定证据法和陪审团法。This thesis examines the fundamental role of separation of powers in jury developing history in Western countries. It says that no separation of powers in our jury system is very important, because it leads to our people＇s jury system to be standstill for a long time. This thesis discusses the advantages of people＇s jury having some separation of powers in the jury system of Henan Province since 2009, while criticizes its shortages. In the end, it provides that China should establish a new people＇s jury system in which the primary characteristic is separation of powers. Thus, the nation＇s legislators should enact a series of statutes regarding such jury system, within which the two most crucial ones are evidence law and law of jury.

关 键 词：分权机制 人民陪审员 河南人民陪审团制度 证据法 陪审团法 

分 类 号：D915.13[政治法律—诉讼法学]