检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国药科大学国际医药商学院,江苏南京211198
出 处:《中国药业》2014年第20期5-7,共3页China Pharmaceuticals
摘 要:目的为推动我国质量受权人制度发展提出合理化建议。方法采用对比分析法,研究中国与欧盟质量受权人制度的差异。结果中国质量受权人制度与欧盟相比仍存在诸多不足,如概念模糊、法律地位不明确、缺乏支撑体系等。结论我国仍需从完善法律法规体系、推行质量受权人审批制及建立支撑体系方面加以完善。Objective To propose the rationalization proposal for promoting the development of the quality authorized person system. Methods The differences in the quality authorized person system between China and Europe were studied by adopting the comparative analysis method. Results Many disadvantages still existed in the quality authorized person system of China,such as the ambiguous con-cept,the undefined legal status and the lack of support system. Conclusion The laws and regulations system is still perfected in china, which are perfected in the aspects of the examination and approval system of the quality authorized person and the establishment of support system.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.42