检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王熠珏[1]
出 处:《重庆交通大学学报(社会科学版)》2014年第5期34-37,共4页Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University:Social Sciences Edition
摘 要:信用卡诈骗罪认定中存在着诸多争议和困惑:厘清持卡人的内涵并对其重新分类;盗窃信用卡并使用的行为实质上应认定为信用卡诈骗,故该规定不是注意规定,而是法律拟制;维持法条原状将恶意透支型犯罪作为信用卡诈骗罪定罪量刑仍具有一定的合理性,目前暂无将其单独设罪的必要;基于主观罪过形式及客观特征的考察,可知本罪存在停止形态。There are a number of confusions and disputes with definitions of Credit Card Fraud. First, the cardholder's connota- tion and the classification should be defined and re - classified. Second, in fact, the qualitative of "Stealing Credit Card and Using It" is a kind of Credit Card Fraud, it is not a provision of attention but a legal fiction. Then, Malicious Overdraft crimes regarded as a kind of Credit Card Fraud still has rationality, so there is no need to let Malicious Overdraft crimes become a new type of crime for the moment. Finally, through the study the subjective and objective characteristics of the Credit Card Fraud, conclusion is drawn that criminal cessation pattern can be existed in this crime.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15