检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张芳[1] 史泱[1] 晁欣[1] 黄露[1] 孙喜斌[1] 曲春燕[1]
出 处:《中国听力语言康复科学杂志》2014年第5期375-377,共3页Chinese Scientific Journal of Hearing and Speech Rehabilitation
基 金:卫生行业科研专项项目(201202005);中国聋儿康复研究中心项目(201202)
摘 要:目的探讨3~5岁听障儿童与健听儿童言语清晰度的差异,为听障儿童康复训练提供参考依据。方法以黄昭鸣一韩知娟词表为测试材料,分别测试3~5岁听障儿童114名和健听儿童36名的言语清晰度得分,并进行对比研究。结果①性别和年龄的差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05);②儿童类型的差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05),听障儿童在3~5岁3个年龄段的言语清晰度均显著低于健听儿童;③两组儿童声母清晰度和韵母清晰度差异均有极显著统计学意义(P〈0.01),声调清晰度差异存在显著统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论3~5岁听障儿童的言语清晰度明显落后于同龄健听儿童,且以声母和韵母的差异最为突出,应重视对听障儿童的言语清晰度训练。Oblective To compare the speech articulation between hearing-impaired children and normal-hearing children and to provide references for the rehabilitation training of hearing-impaired children. Methods The articulation and phonology assessment materials were used to test the speech articulation abilities of 114 hearing-impaired children and 36 normal -hearing children aged 3 to 5. The test scores were compared between the two groups. Results (1)There was no significant difference between different gender and age groups(P〉0.05).(2)The difference between hearing-impaired and normal-hearing children in speech articulation was significant(P〈0.05),and hearing-impaired children lagged far behind their normal-hearing peers.(3)There were highly significant differences in consonant and vowel articulation scores between hearing-impaired and normal-hearing children(P〈0.01),and was a significant difference between the two groups in tone articulation score (P〈0.05). Conclusion In terms of speech articulation, the hearing-impaired children of 3-5 years old fall behind their normal peers, especially in consonant and vowel. Special attention should be given to the speech articulation training for hearing-impaired children.
分 类 号:R764.43[医药卫生—耳鼻咽喉科]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15