论构成要件符合性判断中的事实形成  

On Establishing Facts in Determining Element Criminal Law

作　　者：吴学斌[1] 

机构地区：[1]深圳大学法学院,广东深圳518060

出　　处：《深圳大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2014年第5期85-91,共7页Journal of Shenzhen University：Humanities & Social Sciences

基　　金：司法部国家法治与法学理论研究项目"刑法在中国社会道德变迁中的作用"(09SFB5012)

摘　　要：案件事实的形成在构成要件符合性判断中处于核心位置。司法实践对案件事实的形成存在诸多误区,使得刑法规范与案件事实难以恰如其分地对应。案件事实的形成应该以刑法规范为指导。对于案件事实,既要全面评价,又要禁止重复评价。当案件存在合理怀疑时,应该做出对被告人有利的裁决。在方法上应该坚持类型思维的方法,注重类比推理,同时应该正确适用举轻以明重、举重以明轻的方法。Fact establishment is crucial in determining whether elements of a charge have been proven in criminal prosecution. In legal practice however, misconceptions abound in establishing facts, causing difficulties in establishing a match between the facts of a case and the requirement of element determination. Establishing facts in a criminal case should follow the guidance of criminal codes. Facts must be evaluated comprehensively but not repetitively. When a reasonable doubt exists, the case should be discharged in the defendant＇s favor. In methodology, thinking along analogies must be insisted and emphasized.

关 键 词：构成要件 符合性 事实形成 

分 类 号：D915.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]