完善高校学术问责制的思路  

Thoughts on the Improvement of College Academic Accountability

作　　者：张文[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]燕山大学 [2]赣南师范学院

出　　处：《大学教育科学》2014年第6期40-44,共5页University Education Science

基　　金：江西省教育科学“十二五”规划课题“高校学术问责制的理论建构与实践设计研究”(10YB171);江西省高校人文社会科学研究项目“关于建立高校学术问责制的研究”(JY1104)

摘　　要：在国外,尤其是英美等发达国家,教育管理领域内的问责制无论从制度建设到立法还是从研究到实践,都已比较成熟与完善。而正在开展的我国高校问责制的研究则还只是停留在表层的探讨上。特别是高校学术问责,尚未针对实际问题进行系统研究,实践更有待完善。在学术不端行为不断滋生、蔓延,且有愈演愈烈之势的当前,建立以学者为主体的高校学术道德委员会,实行问责主体学者化、责任认定客观化,以及改革高校"官学一体"的学术管理体制与摒弃量化式的科研业绩考核,乃是完善高校学术问责制的重中之重。同时,倡导"学术为本",坚持"学术自律"及强化人文关怀理念的学术问责文化建设也不可或缺。In foreign countries, especially in developed countries such as Britain and America, the accountability system in the field of education management has been quite mature and perfect not only from system construction to legislation, but also from research to practice. However, the ongoing study of accountability in Chinese colleges and universities are still staying on the surface to explore. In particular, systematic research has not been conducted with regard to the practical problems of university academic accountability and thus practice needs to be further improved. Due to rapidly growing academic misconduct, it＇s essential for us to build up an academic ethics committee consisted mainly of scholars to make clear the real subjects and the responsibility involved. It is also necessary to get rid of the mixture of managers and researchers as a whole and abandon the usual quantitative way of performing research results. At the same time, an academic-oriented and academic-disciplined system with the idea of humanistic concern is also necessary.

关 键 词：高校 学术问责制 问责体系 问责制度 问责文化 

分 类 号：G640[文化科学—高等教育学]