检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]西安理工大学经济与管理学院,陕西西安710054
出 处:《预测》2014年第6期20-24,共5页Forecasting
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(71372172);教育部人文社科规划基金资助项目(10YJA630085)
摘 要:战略采购已成为企业获取持续竞争优势的关键。本文从供应商网络视角出发,对战略采购类型进行区分,探索不同战略采购导向对提升企业竞争能力的影响。通过对238家制造企业样本实证检验发现,成本导向的战略采购直接作用于制造企业成本绩效的改进,整合机制起到部分中介作用;创新导向的战略采购则是通过整合机制作用于制造企业创新绩效的改进,整合机制起到完全中介作用。实证结果表明战略采购导向通过整合机制对两种竞争能力产生不同影响。Strategic purchasing is the key to obtain sustainable competitive advantage of enterprise. In this paper, we discriminate between low-cost-oriented strategic purchasing and innovation-oriented strategic purchasing, and analyze the effective mechanism of two different strategic purchasing on enterprise' competitive capability enhancement from supplier network perspective. The conceptual model is empirically tested using data gathered from 238 Chinese manufacturers. The results indicate that low-cost-oriented strategic purchasing has directly influence on the cost performance improvement, integration mechanism plays partial mediating role. However, innovation-oriented strategic purchasing has no directly influence on the innovation performance improvement, integration mechanism plays an fully mediating role. It shows that strategic purchasing orientation have different effects on the competitive capability under integration mechanism.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117