检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中国健康心理学杂志》2014年第11期1601-1602,共2页China Journal of Health Psychology
基 金:广东省医学科学基金(编号:A2013533)
摘 要:目的观察安非他酮缓释片治疗老年期抑郁症的临床疗效和安全性。方法进行6周的开放式前瞻性随机对照研究,将56名老年期障碍的患者随机分为两组,安非他酮组(26例)和西酞普兰组(30例),疗程6周,采用汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)和汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)及副反应量表(TESS)在治疗前和治疗后1、2、4、6周末评定药物疗效和副反应。结果采用t检验,两组HAMD和HAMA总分及各因子分从疗后2~6周均较治疗前显著降低(t=20.45,13.50,6.7,6.06;P均〈0.01),两组间无显著性差异;治疗结束时TESS评分安非他酮组与西酞普兰组无显著性差异(t=0.23,P〉0.05)。结论安非他酮缓释片治疗老年期抑郁症的疗效及药物不良反应均与西酞普兰相当,可作为治疗老年期抑郁症的一线药物使用。ObjectiveTostudytheefficacyandsafetyofbupropioninthetreatmentofdepression.Methods 56depressedelderly patients were randomized into bupropion group (n=26)and citalopram(n=30),and studied for 6 weeks.HAMD,HAMA and TESS were used to assess the efficacy and side effects before and 1 week,2 weeks,4 weeks and 6 weeks after the treatment .Results There was no significant difference in efficacy between two groups .HAMD scores and factor scores from 2 weeks to 6 weeks decreased dramatically as compared to pretreatment ,no significant difference was observed between two groups .After the trial,the TESS scores in bupropion group were no significant differences from citalopram group .Conclusion Bupropion is an effective ,convenient and safe in the treatment of eld-erly depression .It has few side effects and can be a first drug choice.
关 键 词:抑郁症 安非他酮缓释片 西酞普兰 副反应量表 汉密尔顿抑郁量表 汉密尔顿焦虑量表
分 类 号:R749.053[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3