检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]南华大学附属第2医院新院眼科,湖南衡阳421001
出 处:《中医眼耳鼻喉杂志》2013年第4期221-222,225,共3页Journal of Chinese Ophthalmology and Otorhinolaryngology
基 金:湖南省教育厅,项目编号13C839
摘 要:目的 探讨糖尿病性黄斑水肿光学相干断层扫描的形态学分类各型间的对比分析.研究对象临床有意义糖尿病性黄斑水肿(CSME)患者55例102眼.方法 对CSME组患者进行OCT检查,观察OCT检查的图像特征、分类,并将各种类型的黄斑中心凹中心厚度、最佳矫正视力、糖尿病病程、空腹血糖等临床资料进行对比分析.结果 在OCT分类中,中心凹中心厚度值及最佳矫正logMAR视力在各组间均有显著性差异(P值=0.000,P<0.05),糖尿病病程及空腹血糖在各组间无显著性意义(P值分别为0.306和0.752,P>0.05).结论 糖尿病性黄斑水肿患者的视力预后与黄斑中心凹中心厚度以及黄斑水肿的类型有关;黄斑中心凹中心厚度可作为诊断黄斑水肿的客观定量的重要指标.Objective To discuss the contrast analysis between types of diabetic macular edema classified by optical coherence tomographic features. 55 cases (102 eyes) with clinical significant diabetic macular edema(CSME) were involved. Methods All cases were taken OCT inspection and classified to different types by image characteristics. The central thickness of macular fovea, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), course of disease, fasting plasma glucose (FPG) were analyzed. Results The central thickness of macular fovea and BCVA were different between each types (P〈0.05). Conclusion Vision prognosis is related with central thickness of macular fovea and characteristics of CSME. The central thickness of macular fovea can be selected as an objective index for diagnosis of CSME.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3