解释学转向:价值与论争  

The Value and Debates of the Interpretive Turn

作　　者：王伟[1] 

机构地区：[1]福建社会科学院文学研究所

出　　处：《理论与现代化》2014年第6期16-20,共5页Theory and Modernization

摘　　要：关于意义生产问题,罗蒂提出用"解释学"来取代"认识论"的策略。这一解释学转向主张把事物置于意义之网中进行考察,破除了意义拥有不变本质的神话。它在学界引发了强烈共鸣,但也招致颇多微词。特别值得注意的是,与罗蒂同属新实用主义阵营的舒斯特曼做出了长篇批驳,但它实际上并不成立,又重新堕入传统的基础主义窠臼。About the problems of meaning production, Rorty proposed a ＂hermeneutic＂to replace the＂epistemology＂ strategy. The interpretive turn advocates inspecting things on the web of meaning and gets rid of the myth which means significance has the same essence. It triggered a strong response from the academic community, but also led to quite a lot of criticism. Particularly noteworthily, Shusterman, who belongs to a new pragmatism camp, gave a long refutation of Rorty. But the refutation doesn’t actually make sense and again falls into the traditional foundationalism stereotype.

关 键 词：罗蒂 解释学转向 舒斯特曼 论争 

分 类 号：B0[哲学宗教—哲学理论]