检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]河南理工大学经济管理学院,河南焦作454000
出 处:《资源开发与市场》2014年第12期1504-1506,共3页Resource Development & Market
基 金:国家社科基金青年项目(编号:13CJY045);河南省教育厅科学技术研究重点项目(编号:14A790010);河南省教育厅人文社会科学研究重点项目(编号:2014-ZD-067);河南理工大学青年骨干教师资助项目(编号:649266)
摘 要:经历了十几年的讨论,燃油税改革方案终于在2009年出台并实施,改革后燃油税究竟会对我国宏观经济及各部门产生怎样的影响,倍受关注。基于此背景,采用环境CGE模型对改革前后的两种不同燃油税税率进行了量化分析,总体研究得出:从长期发展来看,燃油税改革有利于我国经济结构调整,减少能源消耗和降低碳排放;短期内会增加企业生产成本,抑制宏观经济增长,其中交通运输业和石油加工业受到的冲击最大,应引起有关部门重视。Through ten years of discussion, the fuel tax reform program was issued and implemented in 2009, after the reform what effect would have on our country's macro economy and departments was still attracted a lot of attention. Based on this background, this paper used the environmental CGE model to quantitatively analyze the two different fuel tax rate before and after the reform, the conclusion was that : From the long - term devel- opment perspective, the fuel tax reform was conducive to Chinese economic structural adjustment, energy consumption reduction and carbon emissions reduction, but in the short term it would increase the production cost of the enterprise, restrain macro economic growth, in which the transportation industry and oil processing industry were taken the biggest impact, relevant departments should pay close attention to.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222